Fixed-scope engagement
Secure Access Build
The old idea of "inside the office network = trusted" stopped working when work went remote. We rebuild access around who someone is and what device they're using — so one stolen laptop or leaked password no longer opens everything you have.
Tell us what’s going onAt a glance
- Best for
- Remote, contractor, and internal access with too much implicit trust
- Scope
- Users, devices, applications, and access paths
- Working shape
- A phased, reversible fixed-scope build
- Main result
- Identity- and device-aware access that is enforced
The problem zero-trust access solves
Common situation: access still means VPN in and be trusted, even though remote work, contractors, and SaaS have made that model unsafe. Root cause: implicit network trust and flat internal access give a compromised identity or device far more lateral reach than it needs; ZTNA products without an access-policy model just relocate the problem.
What you own when we leave
- An access-policy model expressed as policy-as-code (identity + device posture + resource sensitivity → allow/deny), in your repo.
- Terraform/IaC for the enforcement points in scope (identity-aware access, segmentation, conditional access, service-to-service auth).
- A threat model showing lateral-movement paths before and after, so the risk reduction is legible and reviewable.
- Phased rollout runbooks (so you cut over without locking your own people out) and break-glass procedures.
- ADRs for the trust-boundary and enforcement decisions.
Not a maturity-model spreadsheet. A working enforcement model defined as code.
How we approach it
- 01
Discovery
We read your accounts, configs, and constraints directly (scoped read-only access or exported state), map the real current state, and agree on a written scope and success criteria before any code is written.
- 02
Architecture Decision Records
We write down the key decisions — what we’re doing, the options we rejected, and why — as ADRs in your repo, so the reasoning survives long after we’re gone and you can challenge it before we build.
- 03
Implementation
We build the solution as reviewable Terraform/IaC in small, tested pull requests against your CI, so you watch it land incrementally and nothing arrives as a black box.
- 04
Handover
We walk your team through the repo, the threat model, and the runbooks live, confirm you can apply/destroy/extend it yourselves, and then we leave. You own everything — there is no phase 5 where you still need us.
Engagement shape
A fixed-scope build over a defined set of users, applications, and access paths — phased so each cutover is reversible and observed. Scope is bounded by which access paths and enforcement points are in the first phase, agreed up front.
Fixed price, agreed in writing before we start. You can stop at the decision point and keep everything produced.
- 90-day warranty: anything we shipped that does not behave as documented, we fix at no charge.
- Discovery normally uses scoped, read-only roles you create and can revoke; data handling is agreed before access.
- A Senior Engineering Block is available afterward if the next backlog is better handled as flexible hours.
An illustrative example of the format
# policy/access.rego — identity + device posture + sensitivity
package access
default allow := false
allow if {
input.user.mfa_verified
input.device.managed
input.device.disk_encrypted
resource_tier_permitted
}
resource_tier_permitted if {
input.resource.tier != "restricted"
}
resource_tier_permitted if {
input.resource.tier == "restricted"
input.user.group in data.restricted_access_groups
input.device.posture_checked_within_hours <= 24
}FAQ
Questions about this engagement
What do I actually get — is this just a report?
No. Build engagements end with infrastructure-as-code in your repository: Terraform/IaC, the guardrail set (Service Control Policies or equivalents), a threat model, ADRs, and runbooks. The documents exist to help an engineer run the code — they are never a substitute for the working change. Code you own, not slides. The live software, illustrative technical formats, and public repositories on this site show how we document and build.
What if something breaks after you’ve handed over and left?
Work we ship includes a 90-day warranty: if it does not behave as documented, we fix it at no charge — that is a defect, not new scope or time deducted from an Engineering Block. The code and documentation use standard tools your team or another engineer can maintain. If you want us back, the follow-on can be another defined project or a prepaid block of hours.
Can we keep you around after the engagement?
Yes. A Senior Engineering Block is a prepaid pool of hours for agreed investigations, reviews, changes, debugging, questions, or small pieces of implementation. It can follow a project or stand on its own. It is not a subscription, managed-service retainer, or emergency on-call service. Hands-on training is also available on your real environment rather than generic courseware. Neither is required; project handovers are designed so your team can run the result without us.
We already have a security team / platform team. Why bring you in?
Usually because they are at capacity, or the work needs a specific senior depth (landing-zone design, zero-trust enforcement, hybrid routing, AI guardrails) that is hard to staff for a one-time build. We work as reviewable PRs against your CI so your team reviews and absorbs everything as it lands — by handover it is genuinely theirs, not a black box dropped on them.
What access do you need, and how do you handle our data and credentials?
Discovery normally uses scoped, read-only IAM roles that you create and can revoke — not long-lived keys handed to us. Where possible, implementation runs inside your tenancy and CI. Any exports, working copies, retention, deletion, data location, and required service providers are scoped for the engagement and agreed before access is granted. You can inspect the public site too: cookie-free self-hosted analytics, a clean CSP, no session replay, and no advertising trackers.